Viverette v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Antonio Viverette |
| Nancy A Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2018cv02773 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LSS) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 11/21/2018. (AMM)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (LSS)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:18-cv-2773-T-30CPT. Motion REFERRED: #2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency . Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. (SMS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Antonio Viverette. (Steinberg, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A Berryhill filed by Antonio Viverette. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Steinberg, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
