Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Commercial Pool Cleaners, Inc. et al
Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company |
Commercial Pool Cleaners, Inc. and Belkys Garcia Dominguez |
8:2018cv02878 |
November 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Susan C Bucklew |
Amanda Arnold Sansone |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED NOTICE of compliance re 2 Order no pdf Amended Notice Pursuant to Order dated November 28, 2018 [DE 2] (As to Composite Exhibit "A" only) by Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Composite Exhibit A - Amended, #2 Exhibit Composite Exhibit B)(Balducci, Michael) Modified text on 12/7/2018 (LSS). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of compliance re 2 Order no pdf by Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Composite Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Composite Exhibit B)(Balducci, Michael) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 (MSS) |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against Commercial Pool Cleaners, Inc., Belkys Garcia Dominguez with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number TPA-54267 filed by Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Policy, #3 Exhibit B - UM Rejection Form, #4 Exhibit C - Demand from Plaintiff)(LSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.