Tassillo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Tamara Tassillo
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 8:2018cv02919
Filed: November 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Steven D Merryday
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER: Because the parties stipulate that the amount in controversy fails to exceed $75,000, the parties' #9 joint motion to remand is GRANTED and this action is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Florida. The clerk must close the case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 1/8/2019.
December 28, 2018 Filing 9 Joint MOTION to remand to State Court and Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Tamara Tassillo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Affidavit)(McEleney, Sean)
December 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER granting #7 Wells Fargo's motion for an extension through January 4, 2019, of the time within which to respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/26/2018.
December 19, 2018 Filing 7 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal (Unopposed) by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Springfield, Robert)
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 --motion for an extension of time; response to complaint due 12/21/2018. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/14/2018. (BK)
December 11, 2018 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Simms-Petredis, Jacqueline)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER re #3 --notice of designation of track. See document for details. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 12/3/2018. (GSO)
December 3, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2. (GSO) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/3/2018: #1 Main Document) (GSO).
November 30, 2018 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Steven D. Merryday and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:18-cv-2919-T-23AAS. (SJB)
November 30, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pinellas County Circuit Court, case number 18-007029-CI filed in State Court on 10/26/18. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-14875850 filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court File)(Simms-Petredis, Jacqueline) Modified on 11/30/2018 (CTR).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tassillo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Jacqueline Simms-Petredis
Represented By: Robert Franklin Springfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Tassillo
Represented By: Sean Edward McEleney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?