Dempsey v. Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin
Timothy Dempsey |
Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin |
Mark A. Hanley |
8:2018cv02962 |
December 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
Thomas G Wilson |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. § 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ENDORSED ORDER: In light of the Court's Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. #19 ), no case management hearing will be held. Additionally, in order to keep cases moving on track, the Court has found it necessary to impose some restrictions on the types and number of extensions to case management deadlines that it grants. Thus, the parties are advised that, while short extensions, especially if unopposed, will be favorably considered, the Court will not substantially move the dispositive motions deadline or the trial date. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/25/2019. (TWL) |
Filing 19 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/13/2020 at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 14 B before Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, Jury Trial set for the March 2020 trial term in Tampa Courtroom 14 B before Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, Conduct mediation hearing by 9/17/2019. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/25/2019. (TWL) |
Filing 18 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin.(Santamaria, Nicole) |
Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Terry, Scott) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice by Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin. (Midence, Adriana) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin. Related case(s): No (Midence, Adriana) |
***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Adriana R Midence, appearing on behalf of (Filing fee $150 receipt number TPA055020.) Related document: #12 Unopposed MOTION for Adriana R. Midence to appear pro hac vice. (JCG) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 defendant's Unopposed Motion for Adriana R. Midence to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 1/11/2019. (DMS) |
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting Rollins, Inc.'s unopposed motion to extend time to respond to the Complaint. (Doc. #11 ). Response now due January 24, 2019. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/9/2019. (DMD) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Adriana R. Midence to appear pro hac vice by Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin. (Santamaria, Nicole) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin. (Santamaria, Nicole) |
Filing 10 RETURN of service executed on 12/20/2018 by Timothy Dempsey as to Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin. (Terry, Scott) |
Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by January 24, 2019, file a completed Case Management Report. This document can be found on Judge Covington's page of the Court's website at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. Please be advised that the Court's Case Management Report form is different from those used by other judges. Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(E), M.D. Fla., explains that most track two cases, like the present case, "will be tried within one year after the filing of the complaint." To accomplish this goal, the Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery. If the parties believe that more time than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. The Court will then determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/2/2019. (DMD) |
Filing 8 *** Terminated- Counsel notified to re-file using the event Summons Returned Executed *** PROOF of service by Timothy Dempsey (Terry, Scott) Modified text and NEF regenerated on 1/3/2019 (KMM). |
Filing 7 ENDORSED ORDER: Dempsey is directed to provide the Court a status report on his efforts to serve Rollins, Inc. by January 4, 2019. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/27/2018. (DMD) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice by Timothy Dempsey. (Terry, Scott) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Timothy Dempsey. Related case(s): yes (Terry, Scott) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/18/2018. (TWL) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin. (BES) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:18-cv-2962-T-33TGW. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rollins, Inc. d/b/a Orkin with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14899321) filed by Timothy Dempsey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Terry, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.