McKenzie v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al(Sarasota County)
| Charles S. McKenzie |
| Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
| 8:2018cv03048 |
| December 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Charles S. McKenzie. Related case(s): yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Tonja Vickers Rook on behalf of Secretary, Department of Corrections (Rook, Tonja) |
Filing 3
ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. Respondent has 90 days to respond. Petitioner has 30 days to reply to the petition response. Clerk is directed to serve the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 12/21/2018. (Attachments: #1 Service Documents)(RAO)
|
|
Filing 2
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - HABEAS track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 1/2/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/19/2018. (BGS)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus -State. filed by Charles S. McKenzie. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CTR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
