Faison v. The ADT Corporation
Plaintiff: Shawndra Faison
Defendant: The ADT Corporation
Case Number: 8:2018cv03051
Filed: December 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Referring Judge: Mary S Scriven
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 2/4/2019. (DKC)
January 31, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of settlement by Shawndra Faison. (Allen, Amanda)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #10 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time for Serving Response to Complaint. Defendant shall have up to and including January 31, 2019 to file its answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 1/18/2019. (DKC)
January 16, 2019 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by The ADT Corporation. (McNew, Charles)
January 16, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Sanders McNew on behalf of The ADT Corporation. (McNew, Charles)
January 7, 2019 Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 12/27/2018 by Shawndra Faison as to The ADT Corporation. (Allen, Amanda)
January 2, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Shawndra Faison. Related case(s): No (Allen, Amanda)
January 2, 2019 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Shawndra Faison. (Allen, Amanda)
December 20, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to The ADT Corporation. (LNR)
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 1/3/2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 12/20/2018. (KTT)
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 1/3/2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 12/20/2018. (KTT)
December 19, 2018 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:18-cv-3051-T-35AEP. (SJB)
December 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The ADT Corporation with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-14943725) filed by Shawndra Faison. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Allen, Amanda)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faison v. The ADT Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawndra Faison
Represented By: Amanda J. Allen
Represented By: William Peerce Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The ADT Corporation
Represented By: Charles Sanders McNew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?