Thomas
| Tony Thomas |
| 8:2018mc00097 |
| November 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: The Motion of Injunction (Dkt. #1 ) is denied. This miscellaneous case is dismissed without prejudice because it does not relate to any underlying claim or complaint. The Clerk is directed to close this case and send Mr. Thomas a copy of the form for filing a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights complaint and a copy of an in forma pauperis affidavit. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/15/2018. (SMB)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically for injunction by Tony Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tony Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
