Albergo v. Zaccaro-Albergo
| Robert Albergo |
| Marianne Zaccaro-Albergo |
| 8:2019cv00051 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #10 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/25/2019. (Jung, William)
|
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER denying #9 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/25/2019. (Jung, William)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint by Marianne Zaccaro-Albergo. (BES) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration re 7 Order on Motion to Remand by Marianne Zaccaro-Albergo. (BES) |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER denying as moot #6 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/14/2019. (Jung, William)
|
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion to Remand. There is no subject matter jurisdiction in this Court: neither diversity of citizenship nor cognizable "federal question jurisdiction" visible from the four corners of the operative complaint. The time limits on any removal right are long past. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/14/2019. (Jung, William)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint by Marianne Zaccaro-Albergo. (BES) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to remand to State Court by Robert Albergo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Florin, Wilfried) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Robert Albergo. Related case(s): y (Florin, Wilfried) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #2 Related case order and track 2 notice by Robert Albergo. (Florin, Wilfried) |
|
Filing 2
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/9/2019. (SAO)
|
| Filing 1 AMENDED COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for Pinellas County, case number 15-002388-CI Filing fee $ 400, receipt number TPA 54790 filed by Marianne Zaccaro-Albergo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Part One, #2 Exhibit 1 Part Two, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(BES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Albergo v. Zaccaro-Albergo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Albergo | |
| Represented By: | Wilfried Hermann Florin |
| Represented By: | Eric P. Czelusta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Marianne Zaccaro-Albergo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
