Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
Tammy Hill |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
8:2019cv00121 |
January 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Thomas G Wilson |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (CTR) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 1/28/2019. (Wilson, Thomas) |
Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 2/5/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 1/22/2019. (BGS) |
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:19-cv-121-T-36TGW. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. (SJB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Tammy Hill. (Kelley, Jeanette) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Tammy Hill. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Kelley, Jeanette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.