Casino v. Bishop et al
Tabitha Casino |
Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc. and Brian Bishop |
8:2019cv00225 |
January 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
William F Jung |
Christopher P Tuite |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 NOTICE of HEARING on #17 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Plaintiff's Complaint , #16 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Plaintiff's Complaint set for 4/26/2019 at 11:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15 B before Judge William F. Jung. (one hour reserved)(CCB) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Plaintiff's Complaint by Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc.. (Dyson, Sacha) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Plaintiff's Complaint by Brian Bishop. (Dyson, Sacha) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin M. Sullivan on behalf of Brian Bishop, Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc. (Sullivan, Kevin) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory Alan Hearing on behalf of Brian Bishop, Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc. (Hearing, Gregory) |
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to #1 Complaint on or before 3/19/2019. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/6/2019. (CCB) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Brian Bishop, Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc.. (Dyson, Sacha) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by Brian Bishop, Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc.. (Dyson, Sacha) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Brian Bishop, Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc.. Related case(s): no (Dyson, Sacha) |
Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 02/12/2019 by Tabitha Casino as to Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc.. (Serrano, Michael) |
Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 02/12/2019 by Tabitha Casino as to Brian Bishop. (Serrano, Michael) |
Filing 7 *** Counsel notified to re-file using the proper event summons returned executed *** CERTIFICATE of service by Tabitha Casino on Ervin Bishop Construction Inc. (Serrano, Michael) Modified text and NEF regenerated on 3/4/2019 (KMM). |
Filing 6 *** Counsel notified to re-file using the proper event summons returned executed *** CERTIFICATE of service by Tabitha Casino on Brian Bishop. (Serrano, Michael) Modified text and NEF regenerated on 3/4/2019 (KMM). |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by Tabitha Casino. (Serrano, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Tabitha Casino. Related case(s): No (Serrano, Michael) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within sixty days after service of the complaint upon any defendant for the purpose of preparing and filing a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 1/30/2019. See Order for details.(SAO) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Brian Bishop, Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc. (JCG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brian Bishop, Ervin Bishop Constructions, Inc. with Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number TPA055070 filed by Tabitha Casino. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B)(JCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.