Lenkowski v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
Jeremy Lenkowski |
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC and Navy Federal Credit Union |
8:2019cv00281 |
February 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Amanda Arnold Sansone |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ENDORSED ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Navy Federal Credit Union's response due by 4/9/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 3/22/2019. (BEE) |
Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Hartley, Adam) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Navy Federal Credit Union's response due by 3/26/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 2/27/2019. (BEE) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Hartley, Adam) |
Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Navy Federal Credit Union. (Hartley, Adam) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam P. Hartley on behalf of Navy Federal Credit Union (Hartley, Adam) |
Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 2.12.19 by Jeremy Lenkowski as to Navy Federal Credit Union. (McEleney, Sean) |
Filing 8 PROOF of service by Jeremy Lenkowski (McEleney, Sean) Counsel's office notified by telephone on 2/26/19 that item is to be refiled using correct docketing code. Item terminated due to the filing of #9 . Modified on 2/26/2019 (DG). |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Jeremy Lenkowski. (McEleney, Sean) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Jeremy Lenkowski. Related case(s): y (McEleney, Sean) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, Navy Federal Credit Union, Trans Union, LLC. (DG) |
Filing 4 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 2/19/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 2/4/2019. (BGS) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 2/19/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 2/4/2019. (BGS) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:19-cv-281-T-36AAS. (NAS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Navy Federal Credit Union, Trans Union, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15085329) filed by Jeremy Lenkowski. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Proposed Summons, #14 Proposed Summons, #15 Proposed Summons)(McEleney, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.