Rosario v. GP Auto Connection Group Inc.
| Joe Rosario |
| GP Auto Connection Group Inc., a Florida Profit Corporation and GP Auto Connection Group Inc. |
| 8:2019cv00294 |
| February 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| Elizabeth A Kovachevich |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #6 FLSA scheduling order by Joe Rosario. (Guadagnolo, Richard) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by GP Auto Connection Group Inc.(Neilsen, Eric) |
Filing 6
FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 2/6/2019. (SRC)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2 issued by Deputy Clerk on 2/6/2019. (SRC) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to GP Auto Connection Group Inc. (LNR) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 7/15/2008. (LNR)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:19-cv-294-T-17SPF. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GP Auto Connection Group Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15090846) filed by Joe Rosario. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Storch, Noah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
