Rotschrek v. Penzone et al
| Lachlan Rotschrek, Ciaran Templarobrien and Aleksei Kharovsky |
| Attorney general of the state of florida, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Paul Penzone |
| 8:2019cv00465 |
| February 22, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Chelsea Simms Alper on behalf of Paul Penzone (Alper, Chelsea) |
Filing 12
ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. Respondent has 90 days to respond. Petitioner has 30 days to reply to the petition response. Clerk is directed to serve the petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 4/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Service Documents)(RAO)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE to counsel of new case number and judge assignment8:19-cv-465-T-02TGW (signed by deputy clerk). (JNB) |
| Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 2:19-cv-00222. File received electronically |
|
Filing 9
ORDER - Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #6 ) is granted. Petitioner is granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court must transfer the Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this action to the Tampa Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. See document for further details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/21/2019. (RMV) [Transferred from azd on 2/22/2019.]
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles. All future filings shall reflect the following case number: CV-19-222-JAT (CDB). Any deadlines and/or hearings are AFFIRMED unless reset by separate order.. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from azd on 2/22/2019.] |
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Lachlan Rotschrek. (LAD) (2 pages) [Transferred from azd on 2/22/2019.] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Reconsider In Forma Pauperis re: #5 Order by Lachlan Rotschrek. (LAD) (2 pages. Last page is the final page of the Application for In Forma Pauperis form) [Transferred from azd on 2/22/2019.] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - (1) Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is denied. (2) Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee. (3) If Petitioner fails to pay the $5.00 filing fee, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/16/19. (LAD) [Transferred from azd on 2/22/2019.]
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (RMV) [Transferred from azd on 2/22/2019.] |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Lachlan Rotchrek. (1 page) (RMV) [Transferred from azd on 2/22/2019.] |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lachlan Rotchrek. (3 pages) (RMV) [Transferred from azd on 2/22/2019.] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Lachlan Rotchrek. (75 pages) (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Envelope)(RMV) [Transferred from azd on 2/22/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
