Estes Express Lines v. Coverlex, Inc.
Plaintiff: Estes Express Lines
Defendant: Coverlex, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2019cv00467
Filed: February 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment #11 is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff may re-file its Motion for Default Judgment, pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2), and include a memorandum of legal authority which complies with the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 4/19/2019. (BGS)
April 2, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION for default judgment against Coverlex, Inc. by Estes Express Lines. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Roberts, Lawrence) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
March 29, 2019 Filing 10 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Coverlex, Inc. (DG)
March 29, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION for default failure to respond to complaint re #1 Complaint by Estes Express Lines. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Roberts, Lawrence) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
March 14, 2019 Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 03/05/2019 by Estes Express Lines as to Coverlex, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Roberts, Lawrence) Modified on 3/15/2019 (DG).
March 7, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Estes Express Lines. Related case(s): no (Roberts, Lawrence)
March 7, 2019 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Interested persons order by Estes Express Lines. (Roberts, Lawrence)
February 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 3/8/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 2/22/2019. (BGS)
February 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 3/8/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 2/22/2019. (BGS)
February 22, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Coverlex, Inc. (DG)
February 22, 2019 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:19-cv-467-T-36AEP. (SJB)
February 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coverlex, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15161429) filed by Estes Express Lines. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Roberts, Lawrence)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Estes Express Lines v. Coverlex, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estes Express Lines
Represented By: Lawrence J. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coverlex, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?