Kurlander et al v. Kaplan et al
| Baker Hill Holding and Philip Kurlander |
| Robert R. Kaplan, Scott Musil, HC Government Realty Trust, Inc., Leo Kiely, Robert R. Kaplan, Jr. and Bill Fields |
| 8:2019cv00644 |
| March 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| William F Jung |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/18/2019. (CCB)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to William Robert Fields, William L. Kiely, III. (KMM) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for temporary restraining order by Baker Hill Holding, Philip Kurlander. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KMM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to HC Government Realty Trust, Inc., Robert R. Kaplan, Scott Musil. (KMM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bill Fields, HC Government Realty Trust, Inc., Robert R. Kaplan, Jr, Robert R. Kaplan, Leo Kiely, Scott Musil with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 400, receipt number TPA-055718 filed by Philip Kurlander, Baker Hill Holding. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C part 1, #4 Exhibit C part 2, #5 Exhibit C part 3, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(KMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
