Temo et al v. United States of America
| Janine Temo and Charles Temo |
| United States of America |
| 8:2019cv00834 |
| April 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by United States of America.(Tompkins, Joseph) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS returned executed by Charles Temo, Janine Temo. United States of America served on 4/12/2019, answer due 6/11/2019. (Butler, Frank) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Charles Temo, Janine Temo. Related case(s): No (Butler, Frank) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to U.S. Attorney. (LSS) |
| Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Issued by Deputy Clerk on 4/10/2019. (AC) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:19-cv-834-T-30AAS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15329849) filed by Charles Temo, Janine Temo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Butler, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
