Cates v. ADB Management, LLC et al
| Audrey Cates |
| BDA Management, LLC, ADB Management, LLC and ADB Management, LLC doing business as Orthodontic Specialists Of Florida |
| 8:2019cv01010 |
| April 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Elizabeth A Kovachevich |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of service by Audrey Cates re #1 Complaint on defendants ADB Management, LLC d/b/a ORTHODONTIC SPECIALISTS OF FLORIDA and BDA MANAGEMENT, LLC. (Botros, Paul) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2 issued by Deputy Clerk on 5/2/2019. (SRC) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 7/15/2008. (LD)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to ADB Management, LLC, BDA Management, LLC. (LD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:19-cv-1010-T-17JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against ADB MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a ORTHODONTIC SPECIALISTS OF FLORIDA, BDA MANAGEMENT, LLC. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15397951) filed by Audrey Cates. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Botros, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
