Shepard v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Montina Shepard |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2019cv01038 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| James D Whittemore |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER. The Joint Memorandum is due on or before November 18, 2019. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 7/3/2019. (JMF)
|
| Filing 15 SOCIAL security transcript of administrative proceedings re #13 Answer to Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Appendix, #3 Appendix, #4 Appendix, #5 Appendix, #6 Appendix, #7 Appendix, #8 Appendix, #9 Appendix, #10 Appendix, #11 Appendix, #12 Appendix, #13 Appendix, #14 Appendix)(Rudy, John) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security.(Rudy, John) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or respond to #1 Complaint. Commissioner of Social Security's answer or response due 8/7/2019. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 7/2/2019. (CCB)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer until August 7, 2019 by Commissioner of Social Security. (Rudy, John) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #9 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Montina Shepard. Related case(s): no (Steinberg, Michael) |
|
Filing 9
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 5/23/2019. (SAO)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/10. (KMM)
|
| Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Judge William F. Jung. New case number: 8:19-cv-1038-T-02AEP. Judge James D. Whittemore no longer assigned to the case. (JNB) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to reassign this case to another District Court Judge for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 5/21/2019. (SMA)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Notice of designation of track per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Montina Shepard. Related case(s): no (Steinberg, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 1 (CAB) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BSN) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James D. Whittemore and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:19-cv-1038-T-27AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15411167) filed by Montina Shepard. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, #3 Proposed Summons Attorney General of the United States, #4 Proposed Summons US Attorney)(Steinberg, Michael) Modified cause of action on 5/1/2019 (BSN). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
