Francis v. Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
| NATASHA FRANCIS |
| Real Time Resolutions, Inc. |
| Peter J. Grilli |
| 8:2019cv01095 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER appointing Peter J. Grilli as mediator in this action. Mediation Conference set for October 10, 2019. The Court directs that all counsel, parties, corporate representatives, and any other required claims professionals shall be present at the mediation conference with full authority to negotiate a settlement. The Court does not allow mediation by telephone or video conference. Personal attendance is required. See Local Rule 9.05(c). Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/28/2019. (DLB)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of mediation conference/hearing to be held on 10/10/2019 at 9:30 a.m. before Peter J. Grilli. (Phillips, Jason) |
|
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER: The Unopposed Motion to Extend Mediation Deadlines states, "Mr. Grilli has no available dates in September to mediate" and "based [on] Mr. Grilli's schedule, the parties are requesting that the mediation deadline be extended [from September 23, 2019,] to October 31, 2019." (Doc. #14 at 2-3). While the Court understands Peter Grilli's schedule is limited in September, a review of his online calendar reveals multiple dates are available for mediation in early October, including October 2, 9, 10, and 11. Therefore, even if an extension is needed, it is not clear why the parties need until October 31, 2019, to conduct mediation. The deadline to conduct mediation is therefore extended to October 11, 2019. For these reasons, the Unopposed Motion to Extend Mediation Deadlines is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/28/2019. (DLB)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION to extend time to attend mediation until October 31, 2019 by Natasha Francis. (Phillips, Jason) |
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Response due by July 22, 2019. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/21/2019. (Covington, Virginia)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (O'Keeffe, Loretta) |
| Filing 11 RETURN of service executed on 06/03/19 by Natasha Francis as to Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. (Phillips, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are directed to adhere to the Court's Scheduling Order. This action is hereby referred to Peter J. Grilli, Esq., for mediation. The parties must mediate no later than September 23, 2019. Lead Counsel shall file a notice of mediation informing the Court as to the date, time, and location of mediation by July 8, 2019. Neither party may reschedule or cancel the mediation conference once it is set; leave of Court must be obtained before the mediation conference may be rescheduled or cancelled. The parties shall not mediate until the information exchange outlined in the Scheduling Order is completed. Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must appear at the mediation conference. Lead Counsel shall file a notice informing the Court as to the results of mediation within 24 hours of the mediation conference. In the event mediation results in an impasse, the parties must file their jointly-prepared fast-track case management report within 24 hours of the mediation conference. Upon review of the jointly-prepared case management report, the Court will determine whether a case management hearing is necessary. If a case management hearing is necessitated, the Court will set the hearing by separate notice. Furthermore, if mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/11/2019. (DLB)
|
| Filing 9 STATUS report by Natasha Francis. (Phillips, Jason) |
| Filing 8 STATUS report by Natasha Francis. (Phillips, Jason) |
|
Filing 7
ENDORSED ORDER: By May 30, 2019, Plaintiff is directed to provide a status of this case, and in particular detail its efforts to serve the defendant. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/26/2019. (Covington, Virginia)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to effect service of process as required by Rule 4, Fed. R. Civ. P., and file proof thereof with the Court as soon as service has been effected. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/9/2019. (TWL)
|
|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/9/2019. (TWL)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (BES) |
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:19-cv-1095-T-33JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Natasha Francis. (Phillips, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Real Time Resolutions, Inc with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15437582) filed by Natasha Francis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Phillips, Jason) Modified on 5/8/2019 (BES). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
