Debose v. University of South Florida Board of Trustees et al
| Angela Debose |
| Greenberg Traurig, P.A. and University of South Florida Board of Trustees |
| 8:2019cv01132 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's "Motion to Vacate Order" (Doc. #5) is denied. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/29/2019. (SMB)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Vacate #4 Order dismissing case by Angela Debose. (BSN) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This action is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons explained herein. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions as moot. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 5/16/2019. (SMB)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to File Electronically by Angela Debose. (BSN) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically Reassignment of this case to a different District Court Judge by Angela Debose. (BSN) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Greenberg Traurig, P.A., University of South Florida Board of Trustees with Jury Demand filed by Angela Debose. No payment received. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(BSN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
