Jenkins v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Sarasota County)
Clarence Jenkins |
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections |
8:2019cv01141 |
May 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Mary S Scriven |
Julie S Sneed |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Tonja Vickers Rook on behalf of Secretary, Department of Corrections (Rook, Tonja) |
Filing 4 ORDER to respond and show cause why the petition should not be granted. Respondent has 90 days to respond. Petitioner has 30 days to reply to the petition response. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED. Clerk is directed to serve the petition. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 5/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Service Documents)(RAO) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 6/3/2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 5/20/2019. (KTT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Clarence Jenkins. (LD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - State filed by Clarence Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(LD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.