Centola v. Commissioner of Social Security
Maribel Centola |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
8:2019cv01298 |
May 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Amanda Arnold Sansone |
Mary S Scriven |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LNR) |
Filing 9 ***TERMINATED, not signed by all parties, returned to filer.***CONSENT to trial by U.S. Magistrate Judge by Maribel Centola. (Deem, J.) Modified text and image on 6/11/2019 (LNR). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Maribel Centola. Related case(s): yes (Deem, J.) |
![]() |
Filing 6 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Maribel Centola. (Deem, J.) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:19-cv-1298-T-35AAS. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. (SJB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Maribel Centola. (Deem, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Maribel Centola. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Deem, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.