Gough v. Branch Banking And Trust Company
Plaintiff: Daniel Gough
Defendant: Branch Banking And Trust Company ("BB&T") and Branch Banking & Trust Company
Case Number: 8:2019cv01404
Filed: June 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William F Jung
Referring Judge: Thomas G Wilson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2019 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice by Branch Banking & Trust Company identifying Corporate Parent BB&T Corporation for Branch Banking & Trust Company.. (Hendrix, David)
July 8, 2019 Filing 8 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Branch Banking & Trust Company.(Hendrix, David)
June 24, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice by Daniel Gough. (McEleney, Sean)
June 24, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Daniel Gough. Related case(s): No (McEleney, Sean) Modified text on 6/25/2019 (KMM).
June 20, 2019 Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on June 17, 2019 by Daniel Gough as to Branch Banking & Trust Company. (McEleney, Sean)
June 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within sixty days after service of the complaint upon any defendant for the purpose of preparing and filing a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 6/11/2019. (SAO)
June 11, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Branch Banking & Trust Company. (BES)
June 10, 2019 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:19-cv-1404-T-02TGW. (SJB)
June 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Verified) against Branch Banking And Trust Company ("BB&T") with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15559496) filed by Daniel Gough. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Composite Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(McEleney, Sean)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gough v. Branch Banking And Trust Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Gough
Represented By: Sean Edward McEleney
Represented By: Ian Richard Leavengood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Branch Banking And Trust Company ("BB&T")
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Branch Banking & Trust Company
Represented By: David Stockton Hendrix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?