Millar v. Progressive Express Insurance Company
| Ricardo Millar |
| Progressive Express Insurance Company |
| 8:2019cv01485 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Dispositive motions due by 3/16/2020, Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/10/2020 at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15B before Judge William F. Jung, Jury Trial set for the October 2020 trial term commencing 10/05/2020 at 9:00 AM in Tampa Courtroom 15B before Judge William F. Jung, Conduct mediation hearing by 4/15/2020. Lead counsel to coordinate dates. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 7/2/2019. (SAO)
|
| Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Ray, Amy) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by Ricardo Millar. (Yanchuck, Joel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Progressive Express Insurance Company. Related case(s): no (Ray, Amy) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by Progressive Express Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Progressive Express Insurance Company, Other Affiliate for Progressive Express Insurance Company. (Ray, Amy) |
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within sixty days after service of the complaint upon any defendant for the purpose of preparing and filing a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 6/19/2019. (SAO)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:19-cv-1485-T-02CPT. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hillsborough County, case number 19-CA-003861 filed in State Court on 4/12/19. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15597070 filed by Progressive Express Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 State Court COMPLAINT Complaint, #8 State Court ANSWER Answer, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Ray, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Millar v. Progressive Express Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Progressive Express Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Amy Ray |
| Represented By: | Erin M. Diaz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ricardo Millar | |
| Represented By: | Joel P. Yanchuck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
