Rosen v. Exact Sciences Corporation et al
8:2019cv01526 |
March 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 ORDER denying 89 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 2/7/2023. (SFC) |
Filing 101 ORDER denying without prejudice 85 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 2/2/2023. (SFC) |
Filing 99 ORDER granting 92 Motion for leave to file under seal. Unredacted exhibits due 2/6/23 at 5:00 P.M. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 1/30/2023. (SFC) |
Filing 93 ORDER denying 88 Motion for leave to file under seal. Unredacted exhibits due 1/25/23 at 5:00 P.M. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 1/18/2023. (SFC) |
Filing 63 ORDER denying 58 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 3/7/2022. (SFC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rosen v. Exact Sciences Corporation et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.