Redmond v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
TERRENCE REDMOND |
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. |
8:2019cv01535 |
June 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Anthony E Porcelli |
Mary S Scriven |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Turci, Amy) |
Filing 11 ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Telephonically. The parties may telephonically conduct their case management conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 8/13/2019. (JMF) |
Filing 10 Consent MOTION to Appear Telephonically AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.. (Turci, Amy) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #7 Interested persons order by Terrence Redmond. (Roebig, Taylor) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Terrence Redmond. Related case(s): no (Roebig, Taylor) |
Filing 7 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 8/2/2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/19/2019. (KTT) |
Filing 6 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 8/2/2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/19/2019. (KTT) |
Filing 5 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER to Complaint by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc..(Turci, Amy) |
Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #3 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Defendant shall have up to and including July 16, 2019 to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 7/8/2019. (DKC) |
Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer TO COMPLAINT AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.. (Turci, Amy) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:19-cv-1535-T-35AEP. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, case number 2019-003671-ci filed in State Court on 05-28-2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15618694 filed by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Turci, Amy) Modified text on 6/26/2019 (JCG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Redmond v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TERRENCE REDMOND | |
Represented By: | Thomas D. Roebig, Jr. |
Represented By: | Parker Young Florin |
Represented By: | Taylor D. Roebig |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Amy R. Turci |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.