Lusby et al v. Hyundai Motor Company et al
| Dennis Hurt, William Lusby and Martha Orme |
| Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, Kia Motors America, Inc. and Kia Motors Corporation |
| 8:2019cv01735 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ENDORSED ORDER granting the unopposed motion for extension of time to file motion for class certification. (Doc. #17). The Court will set a deadline to file any motions for class certification in the Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/3/2019. (DMD)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Class Certification by All Plaintiffs. (Jeeves, Scott) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #13 plaintiff's motion for Charles J. LaDuca to appear pro hac vice; granting #14 plaintiff's motion for Michael J. Flannery to appear pro hac vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on 8/28/2019. (DMS)
|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #5 Related case order and track 2 notice by William Lusby. (Jeeves, Scott) |
| ***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Michael J. Flannery, appearing on behalf of Dennis Hurt, William Lusby, Martha Orme (Filing fee $150 receipt number TPA057898.) Related document: #14 MOTION for Michael J. Flannery to appear pro hac vice. (WCD) |
| ***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Charles J. LaDuca, appearing on behalf of Dennis Hurt, William Lusby, Martha Orme (Filing fee $150 receipt number TPA057900.) Related document: #13 MOTION for Charles J. LaDuca to appear pro hac vice. (WCD) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by William Lusby. Related case(s): Yes (Jeeves, Scott) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Michael J. Flannery to appear pro hac vice by All Plaintiffs. (Warren, Alexandra) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Charles J. LaDuca to appear pro hac vice by All Plaintiffs. (Warren, Alexandra) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by October 29, 2019, file a completed Case Management Report. This document can be found on Judge Covington's page of the Court's website at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. Please be advised that the Court's Case Management Report form is different from those used by other judges. Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(E), M.D. Fla., explains that most track two cases, like the present case, "will be tried within one year after the filing of the complaint." To accomplish this goal, the Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery. If the parties believe that more time than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. The Court will then determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/20/2019. (DMD)
|
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting the unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the Complaint. (Doc. #8). Based on the agreement of the parties as outlined in the motion, Defendants' response to the Complaint is now due October 22, 2019. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/20/2019. (DMD)
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor Company by Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company. (Hosley, Frank) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement for Kia Motors America, Inc. and Kia Motors Corporation by Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation. (Hosley, Frank) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION to extend time to Respond to Complaint by Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Hosley, Frank) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank D. Hosley on behalf of Hyundai Motor America, Kia Motors America, Inc. (Hosley, Frank) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to effect service of process as required by Rule 4, Fed. R. Civ. P., and file proof thereof with the Court as soon as service has been effected. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/30/2019. (TWL)
|
|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 7/30/2019. (TWL)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company, Kia Motors America, Inc., Kia Motors Corporation. (BES) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Dennis Hurt, William Lusby, Martha Orme. (Jeeves, Scott) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:19-cv-1735-T-33TGW. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15699446) filed by All Plaintiffs.(Jeeves, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
