Crauder v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Gregory Crauder
Defendant: Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2019cv01801
Filed: July 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: James S Moody
Referring Judge: Julie S Sneed
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: The Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (Dkt. #10) is GRANTED. The case is referred to arbitration as provided for in the governing Arbitration Agreement. The Clerk is directed to stay these proceedings and administratively close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 8/27/2019. (SMB)
August 27, 2019 Filing 10 Joint MOTION to compel arbitration and Stay Proceedings, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Promissory Note and Security Agreement)(Rottmann, Emily)
August 7, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Gregory Crauder. Related case(s): no (Gomez, Octavio)
August 7, 2019 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Gregory Crauder. (Gomez, Octavio)
August 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's answer or response due by 9/5/2019.Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 8/1/2019. (BRC)
August 1, 2019 Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc. (Rottmann, Emily) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed.
July 30, 2019 Filing 5 RETURN of service executed on 07/25/2019 by Gregory Crauder as to Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc. (Gomez, Octavio)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 7/26/2019. (KAC)
July 24, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc. (BSN)
July 24, 2019 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:19-cv-1801-T-30JSS. (SJB)
July 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15724071) filed by Gregory Crauder. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Gomez, Octavio)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crauder v. Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Crauder
Represented By: Octavio Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc.
Represented By: Emily Yandle Rottmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?