Williams v. Internal Credit System, Inc. et al
| MEGAN WILLIAMS |
| INTERNAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC., TRIUMPH FIT, INC. and Internal Credit System, Inc. |
| 8:2019cv01872 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Megan Williams. (Steinkraus, Kaelyn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Megan Williams. Related case(s): no (Steinkraus, Kaelyn) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Internal Credit System, Inc., Triumph Fit, Inc. (LSS) |
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 8/1/2019. (KAC)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:19-cv-1872-T-30AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15749966) filed by MEGAN WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons INTERNAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC., #6 Proposed Summons TRIUMPH FIT, INC.)(Steinkraus, Kaelyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
