Gonzalez v. Larjar, Inc.
| Joanne Gonzalez |
| LARJAR, INC., d/b/a Procare Incorporated and Larjar, Inc. |
| 8:2019cv01968 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| James S Moody |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Larjar, Inc..(Hanchett, Richard) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Joanne Gonzalez. (Hill, Brandon) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Joanne Gonzalez. Related case(s): y (Hill, Brandon) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Larjar, Inc. (LSS) |
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 8/9/2019. (SMB)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:19-cv-1968-T-30SPF. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LARJAR, INC., d/b/a Procare Incorporated with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15787436) filed by Joanne Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Hill, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
