Jackson v. Zaderej et al
Harvey Jackson |
Jamie M. Grooms, Guido Neels, Amy Wendell, Mark Gold, Quentin S. Blackford, Peter J. Mariani, Alan M. Levine, Robert J. Rudelius, Karen Zaderej and Gregory G. Freitag |
Axogen, Inc. |
8:2019cv01976 |
August 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Christopher P Tuite |
Stockholders Suits |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 WAIVER of service returned executed on August 29, 2019 by Harvey Jackson as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Executed Waiver of Service, #2 Executed Waiver of Service, #3 Executed Waiver of Service, #4 Executed Waiver of Service, #5 Executed Waiver of Service, #6 Executed Waiver of Service, #7 Executed Waiver of Service, #8 Executed Waiver of Service, #9 Executed Waiver of Service, #10 Executed Waiver of Service)(O'Brien, Cullin) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS issued as to Amy Wendell. (DG) |
***PRO HAC VICE FEES paid by attorney Gregory M. Nespole, appearing on behalf of Harvey Jackson (Filing fee $150 receipt number TPA057897.) Related document: #6 MOTION for Gregory M. Nespole to appear pro hac vice. (WCD) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS issued as to Axogen, Inc., Quentin S. Blackford, Gregory G. Freitag, Mark Gold, Jamie M. Grooms, Alan M. Levine, Peter J. Mariani, Guido Neels, Robert J. Rudelius, Karen Zaderej. (DG) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Harvey Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Proposed Summons, #8 Proposed Summons, #9 Proposed Summons, #10 Proposed Summons)(O'Brien, Cullin) |
Filing 7 ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Gregory M. Nespole. If counsel has not already done so, within 10 days hereof, he shall pay the $150 fee to the Clerk of Court and complete the e-filer registration form (available at http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/special-admission-practice). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 8/22/2019. (AHA) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Gregory M. Nespole to appear pro hac vice by Harvey Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Designation, #2 Notice of Filing, #3 Certificate of Good Standing)(O'Brien, Cullin) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
Filing 5 NOTICE to counsel Gregory M. Nespole of Local Rule 2.02, Special Admission to Practice - Pay the $150.00 Special Admission Fee; Complete the E-Filer Registration Form to obtain a login and password for CM/ECF; Local counsel must electronically file a Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of the non-resident attorney. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (DG) |
Filing 4 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 8/26/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/12/2019. (BGS) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 8/26/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/12/2019. (BGS) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:19-cv-1976-T-36CPT. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15789298) filed by Harvey Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Verification by Harvey Jackson)(O'Brien, Cullin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.