Sherrill v. Monsanto Company
| James David Sherrill |
| Monsanto Company |
| 8:2019cv02061 |
| August 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION panel order transferring case to: Northern District of California re: MDL case number: 2741. (AG) |
| Filing 11 RETURN of service executed on 9/17/19 by James David Sherrill as to Monsanto Company. (Petosa, Frank) |
| Filing 10 PROOF of service by James David Sherrill (Petosa, Frank) COUNSEL TO REFILE ITEM USING CORRECT DOCKETING CODE [SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED] Modified on 9/18/2019 (DG). ITEM TERMINATED DUE TO THE FILING OF #11. Modified on 9/19/2019 (DG). |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by James David Sherrill. (Petosa, Frank) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by James David Sherrill. Related case(s): yes (Petosa, Frank) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company with Jury Demand. filed by James David Sherrill.(Petosa, Frank) |
Filing 6
ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial #1 is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of the date of this Order. 3. Failure to file an Amended Complaint within the time provided will result in dismissal of this action without further notice. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/20/2019. (BGS)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Monsanto Company. (DG) |
|
Filing 4
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 9/3/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/20/2019. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 9/3/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 8/20/2019. (BGS)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:19-cv-2061-T-36AAS. (NAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15819116) filed by James David Sherrill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Petosa, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sherrill v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James David Sherrill | |
| Represented By: | Frank Michael Petosa |
| Represented By: | T. Michael Morgan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
