Conklin v. Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC
| Jeremy Conklin |
| Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC |
| 8:2019cv02137 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1161 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ENDORSED ORDER: The parties have filed a "joint motion for entry of agreed order staying case and transferring plaintiff's claims to arbitration." (Doc. #7). Therein, they explain that they "have agreed that Plaintiff's claims in this matter should be sent to individualized mediation and arbitration proceedings pursuant to Coke Florida's alternative dispute resolution ('ADR') program known as 'P3 Connections.'" In light of this representation, the Court grants the motion to the extent the Court refers this case to arbitration as outlined by the parties in their motion. During the arbitration process, this case is stayed and administratively closed. The parties are directed to provide a joint status report every 120 days. They are also directed to immediately notify the Court upon the completion of the arbitration process. The Clerk is directed to administratively close this case and stay all deadlines entered by the Court. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/6/2019. (DMD)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 6 Order filed by Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC. (Malloy-Thorpe, Jessica) |
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION to stay Case and Transfer Plaintiff's Claims to Arbitration by Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Agreed Order)(Malloy-Thorpe, Jessica) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER: Defendant Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC removed this case from state court on August 26, 2019. (Doc. #1). Thus, under Rule 81(c)(2), Defendant's answer was due September 3, 2019. Yet, no answer or motion for extension of time has been filed. And Conklin has not promptly applied to the Clerk for entry of default pursuant to Local Rule 1.07(b). Accordingly, Conklin is directed to show cause by September 11, 2019, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule 3.10(a). Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/5/2019. (DMD)
|
|
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/27/2019. (TWL)
|
|
Filing 4
ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by September 10, 2019, file a completed Case Management Report. This document can be found on Judge Covington's page of the Court's website at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. Please be advised that the Court's Case Management Report form is different from those used by other judges. Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(E), M.D. Fla., explains that most track two cases, like the present case, "will be tried within one year after the filing of the complaint." To accomplish this goal, the Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery. If the parties believe that more time than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. The Court will then determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/27/2019. (DMD)
|
| Filing 3 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Coca-Cola Beverages Florida Holdings, LLC for Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC. (Malloy-Thorpe, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:19-cv-2137-T-33TGW. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 13th Judicial Circuit, in and for Hillsborough County, Florida, case number 19-CA-8006 filed in State Court on 08/01/2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15847982 filed by Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Malloy-Thorpe, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Conklin v. Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jessica Malloy-Thorpe |
| Represented By: | James P. Daniel |
| Represented By: | Charles B. Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeremy Conklin | |
| Represented By: | Brandon J. Hill |
| Represented By: | Luis A. Cabassa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
