Touchfuse, LLC v. Plum Direct Marketing, LLC
| Touchfuse, LLC |
| Plum Direct Marketing, LLC and Youtech & Associates, Inc. |
| 8:2019cv02248 |
| September 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Thomas G Wilson |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Transmittal of Record to State Court by the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County, Florida. (LD) |
Filing 22
ORDER GRANTING #8 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Request for Expedited Consideration. The Clerk is DIRECTED to REMAND this case to the Circuit Court of the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 9/30/2019. (SBA)
|
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #8 MOTION to remand to State Court , #1 Notice of Removal by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC. (Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to remand to State Court filed by Touchfuse, LLC. (Mitchell, J.) |
|
Filing 18
ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING #17 Plaintiff Touchfuse's Motion for Leave to File a Reply to Motion to Remand and Request for Expedited Consideration. Plaintiff shall have one (1) day from the date of this Order to file a Reply, which shall not exceed two (2) pages. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 9/18/2019. (SBA)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION for leave to file REPLY TO PLUM'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REMAND AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION by Touchfuse, LLC. (Mitchell, J.) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to remand to State Court filed by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Exhibit A - EM from Co-Defendant's Counsel)(Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 15 ***STRICKEN; DISCOVERY NOTICE ATTACHED; COUNSEL NOTIFIED#NOTICE by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC Service of Supplemental Responses to Plaintiff's First Request for Admissions to Plum (Mann, Mark) Modified on 9/12/2019 (JNB). |
|
Filing 14
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 9/26/2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 9/12/2019. (JCG)
|
|
Filing 13
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 9/26/2019. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 9/12/2019. (JCG)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC re #11 MOTION to stay discovery , Reconsider State Court's Order Setting Evidentiary Hearing, and/or Extension of Time of Service (Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to stay discovery , Reconsider State Court's Order Setting Evidentiary Hearing, and/or Extension of Time by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC. (Mann, Mark) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC of Service of Responses to Plaintiff's First Request for Admissions to Plum (Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC re 7 Notice to counsel of Local Rule of Filing Civil Cover Sheet (Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to remand to State Court by Touchfuse, LLC. (Mitchell, J.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to counsel Mark C. Mann of Local Rule 1.05(e), which states - The Clerk is authorized and directed to require a complete and executed AO Form JS44, Civil Cover Sheet, which shall accompany each civil case as a condition to the filing thereof. State and federal prisoners, and other persons filing civil cases pro se are exempt from the requirements of this subsection. File a completed Civil Cover Sheet using the event Notice (Other) (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (LD) |
| Filing 6 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. New case number: 8:19-cv-2248-T-35TGW. (SJB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC re #2 Notice (Other), #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Notice (Other), #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement of Service (Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC. (Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal Second Notice of Filing Exhibits and State Court Filings (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents Order Setting Evidentiary Hearing, #4 State Court Pending Motions Pro Hac Vice Motion, #5 State Court Pending Motions Amended Motion for Enlargement of Time)(Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal First Notice of Filing Exhibits and State Court Filings (Attachments: #1 State Court Pending Motions Exhibit A-2, #2 State Court Other Documents Exhibit B, #3 State Court Other Documents Exhibit C, #4 State Court Other Documents Exhibit D, #5 State Court Other Documents Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F)(Mann, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the 13th Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County, Florida, case number 2019-CA-008251 filed in State Court on 08/08/2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15896908 filed by Plum Direct Marketing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court ANSWER, #3 State Court Docket Sheet)(Mann, Mark) Modified on 9/10/2019 (LD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
