Schuh et al v. City of St. Petersburg et al
| Michelle Harris, Eduardo Zavala and Daniel Schuh |
| Laurie Macdonald, Emily Elwyn, Laura Duvekot, St. Petersburg Preservation, Inc., Peter Belmont, Howard Ferebee Hansen and City of St. Petersburg |
| 8:2019cv02446 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM in opposition re #15 Motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdictionMotion to dismiss for failure to state a claim filed by Michelle Harris, Daniel Schuh, Eduardo Zavala. (Labbee, Michael) |
Filing 21
ORDER granting the #18--motion to extend the time within which to respond to the "non-governmental defendants'" #15--motion to dismiss; directing the plaintiffs to respond no later than 11/6/2019. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 11/1/2019. (GSO)
|
| Filing 20 MEMORANDUM in opposition re #11 Motion to dismiss filed by Michelle Harris, Daniel Schuh, Eduardo Zavala. (Labbee, Michael) |
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in opposition re #13 Motion to dismiss filed by Michelle Harris, Daniel Schuh, Eduardo Zavala. (Labbee, Michael) |
| Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #15 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim by All Plaintiffs. (Labbee, Michael) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16--motion for an extension of time; extending through 10/31/2019 the time within which the plaintiff must respond to #11--motion to dismiss; striking #9--unsigned motion. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/24/2019. (BK) Modified on 10/24/2019 (BK)
|
| Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint , #9 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint by All Plaintiffs. (Labbee, Michael) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction , MOTION to dismiss for failure to state a claim by Peter Belmont, Emily Elwyn, Howard Ferebee Hansen, Laurie Macdonald, St. Petersburg Preservation, Inc.. (Ross, Howard) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Order per Local Rule 1.04(d) by City of St. Petersburg. Related case(s): Yes (Dema, Michael) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by City of St. Petersburg. (Dema, Michael) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Order per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Peter Belmont, Emily Elwyn, Howard Ferebee Hansen, Laurie Macdonald, St. Petersburg Preservation, Inc.. Related case(s): yes (Ross, Howard) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint by Laura Duvekot. (Patner, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Order per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Laura Duvekot. Related case(s): Yes (Patner, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 ***STRICKEN PURSUANT TO ORDER #17*** MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint by Laura Duvekot. (Patner, Joseph) Modified on 10/25/2019 (CTR). |
|
Filing 8
ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Defendants, St. Petersburg Preservation, Inc. d/b/a Preserve the 'Burg, a Florida Not for Profit Corporation, Peter Belmont, Emily Elwyn, Howard Ferebee Hansen, and Laurie Macdonald's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time; granting #7 Defendant, City of St. Petersburg's, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants must respond to the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 1-1 at 6-22) by October 17, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 10/7/2019. (JAR)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by City of St. Petersburg. (Dema, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal by Peter Belmont, Emily Elwyn, Howard Ferebee Hansen, Laurie Macdonald, St. Petersburg Preservation, Inc.. (Ross, Howard) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to counsel Michael Joseph Dema of Local Rule 2.01(d), which states, each attorney must register with the Clerk of the Court and maintain an email address for electronic service by the Clerk. Maintain your e-mail address by logging into CM/ECF or register for a CM/ECF Account at www.flmd.uscourts.gov (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CTR) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re #3--notice of designation of track. See document for details. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 10/4/2019. (GSO)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2. (GSO) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Steven D. Merryday and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:19-cv-2446-T-23JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Sixth Judicial Circuit - Pinellas County, case number 18-007493-CI filed in State Court on 11/15/18. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15985462 filed by Laura Duvekot. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Second Amended, #2 State Court Pending Motions, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 State Court Other Documents, #5 State Court Other Documents, #6 State Court Other Documents, #7 State Court Other Documents, #8 State Court Other Documents, #9 State Court Other Documents, #10 State Court Other Documents, #11 State Court Other Documents, #12 State Court Other Documents, #13 State Court Other Documents, #14 State Court Other Documents, #15 State Court Other Documents, #16 State Court Other Documents, #17 State Court Other Documents, #18 Civil Cover Sheet)(Patner, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
