Hayden v. Commissioner of Social Security
Scarlett Renee Hayden |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
8:2019cv02473 |
October 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
William F Jung |
Julie S Sneed |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (BES) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Scarlett Renee Hayden. (Taylor, Theodore) |
Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 10/8/2019. (SAO) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 10/7/2019. (BRC) |
Filing 3 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway. (BES) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Scarlett Renee Hayden. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Indigency)(BES) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Scarlett Renee Hayden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.