Montreuil v. PGT Industries, Inc.
Frederic Montreuil |
PGT Industries, Inc. |
8:2019cv02544 |
October 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Christopher P Tuite |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Compton, Jennifer) |
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #10 Joint Motion to Conduct Case Management Conference Telephonically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 11/25/2019. (AHA) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by PGT Industries, Inc.. Related case(s): n (Compton, Jennifer) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by PGT Industries, Inc.. (Compton, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 Joint MOTION for miscellaneous relief, specifically to Conduct Case Management Conference Telephonically by PGT Industries, Inc.. (Compton, Jennifer) |
Filing 9 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by PGT Industries, Inc..(Compton, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 10/18/2019 by Frederic Montreuil as to PGT Industries, Inc.. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to PGT Industries, Inc. (CTR) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Frederic Montreuil. (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Frederic Montreuil. Related case(s): no (Florin, Wolfgang) |
Filing 4 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 10/30/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 10/16/2019. (BGS) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 10/30/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 10/16/2019. (BGS) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:19-cv-2544-T-36CPT. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PGT Industries, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16028482) filed by Frederic Montreuil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Florin, Wolfgang) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Montreuil v. PGT Industries, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PGT Industries, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jennifer B. Compton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Frederic Montreuil | |
Represented By: | Wolfgang M. Florin |
Represented By: | Christopher D. Gray |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.