Napolitano v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Nicholas Napolitano |
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. |
8:2019cv02706 |
October 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
James S Moody |
Amanda Arnold Sansone |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Defendant's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc..(Crocker, Bradley) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #3) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's FCCPA and FDCPA claims are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's RESPA claims are not dismissed. Defendant shall file its answer to the RESPA claims within fourteen (14) days of this Order. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 12/13/2019. (SMB) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Nicholas Napolitano. (Kim, Young) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Nicholas Napolitano. (Kim, Young) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #6 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Nicholas Napolitano. Related case(s): yes (Kim, Young) |
Filing 6 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 11/6/2019. (SMB) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. Related case(s): yes (Crocker, Bradley) Modified text on 11/7/2019 (BSN). |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Crocker, Bradley) Modified text on 11/7/2019 (BSN). |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Crocker, Bradley) Modified text on 11/7/2019 (BSN). |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:19-cv-2706-T-30AAS. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, case number 19-CA-10024 filed in State Court on 09/30/2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-16091251 filed by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Other Documents, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crocker, Bradley) Modified text on 11/1/2019 (JNB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Napolitano v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nicholas Napolitano | |
Represented By: | Young Vincent Kim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Bradley William Crocker |
Represented By: | Benjamin Bruce Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.