Mehta v. Fatica et al
Plaintiff: Mr. Rajnish Mehta and Rajnish Mehta
Defendant: Acting Field Office Erin Fatica, Acting Director Mark Koumans, William Barr, Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Erin Fatica, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Kevin McAleenan and Mark Koumans
Case Number: 8:2019cv02728
Filed: October 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Hernandez Covington
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2019 Filing 18 PROOF of service by Rajnish Mehta. (Patel, Dilipkumar)
November 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by January 29, 2020, file a completed Case Management Report. This document can be found on Judge Covington's page of the Court's website at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. Please be advised that the Court's Case Management Report form is different from those used by other judges. Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(E), M.D. Fla., explains that most track two cases, like the present case, "will be tried within one year after the filing of the complaint." To accomplish this goal, the Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery. If the parties believe that more time than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. The Court will then determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/22/2019. (MWS)
November 22, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of compliance re 9 Order Dated November 18, 2019 by Rajnish Mehta. (Patel, Dilipkumar)
November 21, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #5 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Rajnish Mehta. Related case(s): no (Patel, Dilipkumar)
November 20, 2019 Filing 14 PROOF of service by Rajnish Mehta. (Patel, Dilipkumar)
November 20, 2019 Filing 13 PROOF of service by Rajnish Mehta. (Patel, Dilipkumar)
November 20, 2019 Filing 12 PROOF of service by Rajnish Mehta. (Patel, Dilipkumar)
November 20, 2019 Filing 11 SUMMONS issued as to William Barr. (LNR)
November 19, 2019 Filing 10 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Rajnish Mehta. (Patel, Dilipkumar)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER: On November 12, 2019, Mehta filed a proof of service indicating that he served Erin Fatica, as Acting Field Office Director for U.S. Customs and Immigration Services, by sending her a copy of the summons and complaint by certified mail. (Doc. #7). The next day, Mehta filed another proof of service indicating that he sent a copy of the summons and complaint to the United States Attorney for this district by certified mail. (Doc. #8). To properly serve a United States agency or employee sued in an official capacity, a plaintiff must comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i)(2), which requires that the plaintiff "serve the United States and also send a copy of the summons and of the complaint by registered or certified mail to the agency, corporation, officer, or employee." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2). To serve the United States, a plaintiff must serve the summons and complaint on the United States Attorney for the district where the action is brought as well as send a copy of each by registered or certified to the Attorney General in Washington, D.C. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1). While the service documents on the docket show that Mehta has delivered the summons and complaint to Fatica and the United States Attorney for this district, Mehta has yet to file a notice or proof of service showing that he has sent a copy of the summons and complaint to the Attorney General in Washington, D.C., as required by Rule 4(i)(1)(B). Thus, at this juncture, the Court is not convinced that Mehta has properly served the United States. Accordingly, Mehta is directed to provide more information concerning his efforts to serve the United States in accordance with Rule 4(i)(1) by November 25, 2019. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/18/2019. (MWS)
November 14, 2019 Filing 8 PROOF of service by Rajnish Mehta (Patel, Dilipkumar)
November 12, 2019 Filing 7 PROOF of service by Rajnish Mehta. (Patel, Dilipkumar)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to effect service of process as required by Rule 4, Fed. R. Civ. P., and file proof thereof with the Court as soon as service has been effected. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/12/2019. (TWL)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/12/2019. (TWL)
November 4, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to William Barr, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Erin Fatica, Mark Koumans, Kevin McAleenan. (Attachments: # 1 Main Document, # 2 Main Document, # 3 Main Document, # 4 Main Document)(WCD) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/4/2019: #5 Main Document, #6 Main Document, #7 Main Document, #8 Main Document, #9 Main Document) (WCD).
November 1, 2019 Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:19-cv-2728-T-33AAS. (SJB)
November 1, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing Fee $400, Receipt # 113A-16096111) filed by Rajnish Mehta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Proposed Summons Fantica, #8 Proposed Summons Cuccinelli, #9 Proposed Summons Mcaleenan, #10 Proposed Summons Koumans, #11 Proposed Summons Barr - US Atty)(Patel, Dilipkumar) Modified on 11/1/2019 to correct docket text(SJB).
October 31, 2019 Filing 1 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Rajnish Mehta. (Patel, Dilipkumar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mehta v. Fatica et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. Rajnish Mehta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rajnish Mehta
Represented By: Dilipkumar Patel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Field Office Erin Fatica
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Director Mark Koumans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erin Fatica
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kenneth T. Cuccinelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kevin McAleenan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Koumans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?