Solomon v. State Of Florida et al
Rico Dontay Solomon |
State Of Florida, Hillsborough County 13th Judicial Circuit Court and Florida Department of Corrections |
8:2019cv02845 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
William F Jung |
Thomas G Wilson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for default judgment against Florida Department of Corrections, Hillsborough County 13th Judicial Circuit Court, State Of Florida by Rico Dontay Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Rico Dontay Solomon. Related case(s): yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LNR) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 11/25/2019. (SAO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Rico Dontay Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LNR) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Florida Department of Corrections, Hillsborough County 13th Judicial Circuit Court, State Of Florida filed by Rico Dontay Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LNR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.