Bolano v. Auto Safe & Sound, Inc.
| Idelfonso Bolano |
| Auto Safe & Sound, Inc. |
| Mark A. Hanley |
| 8:2019cv02871 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #9 Order by Idelfonso Bolano. (Gonzalez, Cynthia) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Auto Safe & Sound, Inc.(Gonzalez, Thomas) |
Filing 15
ORDER appointing Mark Hanley as mediator in this action. The mediation conference is scheduled for March 10, 2020, at 1:30 PM. The Court directs that all counsel, parties, corporate representatives, and any other required claims professionals shall be present at the mediation conference with full authority to negotiate a settlement. The Court does not allow mediation by telephone or video conference. Personal attendance is required. See Local Rule 9.05(c). Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/3/2020. (SGM)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of mediation conference/hearing to be held on March 10, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. before Mark A. Hanley. (Gonzalez, Thomas) |
|
Filing 13
ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion to extend time. This is a fast track case which means that the case is supposed to be litigated quickly. Here the parties are asking for a one month delay in a hopeful resolution of the case and their reason is that the parties have been unable to agree to a date before March 10. This time the Court will reluctantly allow the extension. The parties are advised that this is not the type of reason that the Court finds compelling and this is not the normal practice in fast track cases. Furthermore, if the case is not settled at mediation, the Court will be disinclined to allow any extensions given that the case will be already one month behind schedule. The parties should file their notice of mediation forthwith. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/30/2019. (Covington, Virginia)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION to extend time to mediation deadline by Auto Safe & Sound, Inc (Gonzalez, Thomas) |
|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension to File Defendant's Responsive Pleading (Doc. #10). Defendant's response to the Complaint is due on or before January 6, 2020. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/16/2019. (SGM)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Auto Safe & Sound, Inc. (Gonzalez, Thomas) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are directed to adhere to the Court's Scheduling Order. This action is hereby referred to Mark A. Hanley, Esq., for mediation. The parties must mediate no later than February 14, 2020. Lead Counsel shall file a notice of mediation informing the Court as to the date, time, and location of mediation by December 30, 2019. Neither party may reschedule or cancel the mediation conference once it is set; leave of Court must be obtained before the mediation conference may be rescheduled or cancelled. The parties shall not mediate until the information exchange outlined in the Scheduling Order is completed. Absent compelling circumstances and leave of Court, lead counsel must appear at the mediation conference. Lead Counsel shall file a notice informing the Court as to the results of mediation within 24 hours of the mediation conference. In the event mediation results in an impasse, the parties must file their jointly-prepared fast-track case management report within 24 hours of the mediation conference. Upon review of the jointly-prepared case management report, the Court will determine whether a case management hearing is necessary. If a case management hearing is necessitated, the Court will set the hearing by separate notice. Furthermore, if mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/2/2019. (TWL)
|
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on 11/25/2019 by Idelfonso Bolano as to Auto Safe & Sound, Inc. (Gonzalez, Cynthia) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to effect service of process as required by Rule 4, Fed. R. Civ. P., and file proof thereof with the Court as soon as service has been effected. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/26/2019. (TWL)
|
|
Filing 6
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/26/2019. (TWL)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Idelfonso Bolano. (Gonzalez, Cynthia) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Idelfonso Bolano. Related case(s): yes (Gonzalez, Cynthia) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Auto Safe & Sound, Inc. (WCD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:19-cv-2871-T-33JSS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Auto Safe & Sound, Inc. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16169810) filed by Idelfonso Bolano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons for Auto Safe & Sound)(Gonzalez, Cynthia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
