Henley v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Camille Henley |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2019cv03011 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LD) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on January 10, 2020. (BRC)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1 issued by Deputy Clerk on 12/24/2019. (SRC) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1). Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (LD)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:19-cv-T-60JSS. (LRB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Camille Henley. (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Camille Henley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Berger, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
