Rosello v. Keathel Chauncey Esq. et al
| Roland A. Rosello |
| Keathel Chauncey Esq., Rivera Chiropractic, Inc. and Fresh Legal Perspective, PL |
| 8:2019cv03027 |
| December 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Rivera Chiropractic, Inc.(Printy, Gary) |
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Rivera Chiropractic, Inc. shall file its responsive pleading or motion directed to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before January 29, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 1/10/2020. (MJP)
|
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to complaint by Rivera Chiropractic, Inc.. (Printy, Gary) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary L. Printy, Jr on behalf of Rivera Chiropractic, Inc. (Printy, Gary) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER: The Clerk is directed to STRIKE #11 Plaintiff's Answer to Affirmative Defenses. A reply to an answer is allowed only if ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a)(7). Plaintiff neither sought nor received leave from this Court to file a reply. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 1/6/2020. (GLP)
|
| Filing 11 ***STRICKEN PURSUANT TO ORDER 12***REPLY to affirmative defenses by Roland A. Rosello. (Vollrath, Frederick) Modified on 1/6/2020 (CTR). |
| Filing 10 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Keathel Chauncey Esq. and Fresh Legal Perspective, PL (Chauncey, Keathel) Modified on 1/2/2020 (BES). |
| Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on Decenber 13, 2019 by Roland A. Rosello as to Fresh Legal Perspective, PL. (Vollrath, Frederick) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on December 18,2019 by Roland A. Rosello as to Rivera Chiropractic, Inc. (Vollrath, Frederick) Modified on 12/30/2019 (DG). |
| Filing 7 RETURN of service executed on December 13, 2019 by Roland A. Rosello as to Keathel Chauncey Esq. (Vollrath, Frederick) Modified on 12/30/2019 (DG). |
| Filing 6 PROOF of service by Roland A. Rosello (Vollrath, Frederick) Item terminated due to the filing of #8 using correct docketing code. Modified on 12/30/2019 (DG). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Roland A. Rosello. Related case(s): NO (Vollrath, Frederick) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Interested persons order by Roland A. Rosello. (Vollrath, Frederick) |
|
Filing 3
INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 12/26/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/11/2019. (BGS)
|
|
Filing 2
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 12/26/2019. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/11/2019. (BGS)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fresh Legal Perspective, PL, Keathel Chauncey Esq., Rivera Chiropractic, Inc. with Jury Demand Filing fee $ 400, receipt number TPA059217 filed by Roland A. Rosello. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CTR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
