Halilic v. Commissioner of Social Security
Sabiha Halilic |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
8:2019cv03039 |
December 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
William F Jung |
Julie S Sneed |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Sabiha Halilic. Related case(s): no (Steinberg, Michael) |
Filing 5 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (LNR) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LNR) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 12/11/2019. (SAO) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed. New case number: 8:19-cv-3039-T-02JSS. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16242235) filed by Sabiha Halilic. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed summons for Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, #3 Proposed summons for Attorney General of the United States, #4 Proposed summons for US Attorney)(Steinberg, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.