Groves v. Commissioner of Social Security
| FayeLynn Groves |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2019cv03119 |
| December 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Mary S Scriven |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by FayeLynn Groves. Related case(s): No (Escarraz, Enrique) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LD) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by FayeLynn Groves. (Escarraz, Enrique) |
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 1/27/2020. Signed by Judge Mary S. Scriven on 1/13/2020. (APV)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway. (BES)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Mary S. Scriven and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:19-cv-3119-T-35AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16277019) filed by FayeLynn Groves. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Escarraz, Enrique) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
