Starr v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Otto Starr
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. doing business as Wells Fargo Auto
Case Number: 8:2019cv03209
Filed: December 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 0201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ENDORSED ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. answer or response due on or before 3/20/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 2/19/2020. (JMF)
February 19, 2020 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Pasky, Daniel) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
February 19, 2020 Filing 16 ***TERMINATED-COUNSEL ON SIGNATURE LINE DOES NOT MATCH COUNSEL OF ENTRY-WRONG DOCUMENT-WRONG CASE NUMBER-COUNSEL NOTIFIED TO RE-FILE***Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Pasky, Daniel) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. Modified on 2/19/2020 (CTR).
February 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ENDORSED ORDER granting #14 Motion to Appear Telephonically. The parties may telephonically conduct their case management conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 2/19/2020. (JMF)
February 19, 2020 Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Ian Leavengood and Daniel Pasky to appear telephonically at Case Management Conference by Otto Starr. (Leavengood, Ian) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
January 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or respond. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. answer or response due on or before 2/20/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli on 1/23/2020. (JMF)
January 22, 2020 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Pasky, Daniel) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. Modified event type on 1/23/2020 (CTR).
January 21, 2020 Filing 11 RETURN of service executed on January 8, 2020 by Otto Starr as to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Leavengood, Ian)
January 14, 2020 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Otto Starr. (Leavengood, Ian)
January 14, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Otto Starr. Related case(s): n (Leavengood, Ian)
January 13, 2020 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Interested persons order by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Wells Fargo & Company for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Pasky, Daniel) Modified text on 1/17/2020 (AG).
January 13, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J. Pasky on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Pasky, Daniel)
January 13, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Richard Bowyer on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Bowyer, Jason)
January 2, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (BES)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 1/16/2020. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 1/2/2020. (BGS)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 1/16/2020. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 1/2/2020. (BGS)
December 31, 2019 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:19-cv-3209-T-36AEP. (SMS)
December 31, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., d/b/a Wells Fargo Auto with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16304325) filed by Otto Starr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Proposed Summons, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Leavengood, Ian) Modified on 1/2/2020 (BES).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Starr v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Otto Starr
Represented By: Ian Richard Leavengood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Daniel J. Pasky
Represented By: Jason Richard Bowyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. doing business as Wells Fargo Auto
Represented By: Daniel J. Pasky
Represented By: Jason Richard Bowyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?