Spence Henry v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Arrita Spence Henry |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2020cv00181 |
| January 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER concerning proceedings in civil cases re: Coronavirus Pandemic. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 3/23/2020. (SRC)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to United States Attorney, United States Attorney General and Office of the Regional Chief Counsel. (CRH) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 1/28/2020. (CDM)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1 issued by Deputy Clerk on 1/28/2020. (SRC) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 7/23/2010. (MCB)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arrita Spence Henry. (MCB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Arrita Spence Henry. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(MCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
