Gray v. Moody Jr., et al
Plaintiff: Phillip Gray
Defendant: Ashley Moody, judge James S. Moody, Jr., Office of the Florida Attorney General and James S. Moody, Jr.
Case Number: 8:2020cv00523
Filed: March 5, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William F Jung
Referring Judge: Amanda Arnold Sansone
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER denying #5 Motion to Correct. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/24/2020. (Jung, William)
March 23, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION to Correct 4 Order no pdf by Phillip Gray. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(LNR)
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE: The case seeks civil damages under 25 CFR 11.448. That Code of Federal Regulations only applies to Indian Courts in Indian Territory. This is not such a jurisdiction. 25 C.F.R. 11.448 also proscribes a crime in Indian territory, not a civil offense. There is no civil cause of action for violation of 25 C.F.R. 11.448. The matter is non-justiciable. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 3/6/2020. (Jung, William)
March 6, 2020 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:20-cv-523-T-02AAS. (SJB)
March 5, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Phillip Gray. (TDC) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone.
March 5, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Phillip Gray. (Attachments: #1 Main Document, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons)(Gray, Phillip) Modified on 3/6/2020 to correct docket text (SJB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gray v. Moody Jr., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashley Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: judge James S. Moody, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of the Florida Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James S. Moody, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?