Horton v. Raisch et al
| Billy-Jack Horton |
| Raisch, Guzman, Leach, Caminero, Pearson, Barto, Sivik, Hastings and Major Kennedy |
| 8:2020cv00611 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER directing Plaintiff to either file a completed Prisoner Consent and Financial Certificate form or pay the $400.00 filing fee on or before 5/17/2020. The required form is attached to this order. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 4/28/2020. (SRC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Billy-Jack Horton. Related case(s): no (CRH) |
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 3/20/2020. (SRC)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Billy-Jack Horton. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CRH) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Barto, Caminero, Guzman, Hastings, Kennedy, Leach, Pearson, Raisch, Sivik filed by Billy-Jack Horton. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
