Baures v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Amber Camille Baures |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2020cv00757 |
| March 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to United States Attorney, Attorney General of the United States, and Office of the Regional Chief Counsel. (CRH) |
Filing 5
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 4/8/2020. (SRC)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 4/1/2020. (MJP)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 07/23/2010. (CRH)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Amber Camille Baures. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(CRH) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Amber Camille Baures. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(CRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
